Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate in dry-powder inhaler users for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea.

BACKGROUND: A suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) in dry-powder inhaler (DPI) users can lead to insufficient therapeutic effects in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, few data on the prevalence of and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR in Korean patients with COPD are available. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with COPD who had been using DPIs for more than three months. PIFR was measured using an In-Check DIAL G16 device. Suboptimal PIFR was defined as below the resistance-matched threshold. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with suboptimal PIFR. RESULTS: Of 444 DPI users with COPD, the rate of suboptimal PIFR was 22.0 % (98/444). In a multivariable analysis, significant factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.06 by 1-year increase; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.09), male sex (aOR = 0.28; 95 % CI = 0.11-0.73), body mass index (BMI) (aOR = 0.91 by 1 kg/m2 increase; 95 % CI = 0.85-0.99), post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) %pred (aOR = 0.97 by 1%pred increase; 95 % CI = 0.95-0.99), and In-Check DIAL R2-type inhaler [medium-low resistance] use (aOR = 3.70 compared with R1-type inhalers [low resistance]; 95 % CI = 2.03-7.03). CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, more than one-fifth of DPI users with COPD had a suboptimal PIFR. The factors associated with suboptimal PIFR were age, female gender, low BMI, low FVC, and R2-type inhaler use. Therefore, clinicians should carefully evaluate the possibility of suboptimal PIFR when prescribing DPIs.

Long-term impacts of COVID-19 on severe exacerbation and mortality in adult asthma: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In adults with asthma, the long-term impact of previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on severe exacerbations and mortality is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term risk of severe exacerbation and mortality in adults with asthma who recovered from COVID-19. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database, we compared the risk of severe exacerbations (emergency room visits or hospitalization) and mortality in adults with asthma aged >20 years recovered from COVID-19 between October 8, 2020, and December 16, 2021 (COVID-19 cohort, n=10,739) with 1:1 propensity score-matched controls (n=10,739). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 87 (range, 15-448) days, the incidence rate of severe exacerbation in the COVID-19 cohort and matched cohort was 187.3 and 119.3 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of severe exacerbation compared to the matched cohort (hazard ratio=1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.06-2.32). During a median follow-up of 360 (range, 15-721) days, the incidence rate of death in the COVID-19 and matched cohort was 128.3 and 73.5 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of death (hazard ratio=1.76; 95% CI=1.33-2.30) compared to the matched cohort. When further analyzed by COVID-19 severity, severe COVID-19 was associated with a 5.12-fold (95% CI=3.27-8.01) and 7.31-fold (95% CI=5.41-9.88) increased risk of severe exacerbation and death, respectively, but non-severe COVID-19 was not. CONCLUSION: Our study heightens that severe COVID-19 is associated with increased long-term risk of severe exacerbation and mortality among individuals with asthma.

Increased Risk of Incident Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Related Hospitalizations in Tuberculosis Survivors: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) survivors have an increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study assessed the risk of COPD development and COPD-related hospitalization in TB survivors compared to controls. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of TB survivors and 1:1 age- and sex-matched controls using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database collected from 2010 to 2017. We compared the risk of COPD development and COPD-related hospitalization between TB survivors and controls. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 9.6% developed COPD, and 2.8% experienced COPD-related hospitalization. TB survivors had significantly higher COPD incidence rates (36.7/1,000 vs. 18.8/1,000 person-years, P < 0.001) and COPD-related hospitalization (10.7/1,000 vs. 4.3/1,000 person-years, P < 0.001) than controls. Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed higher risks of COPD development (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-1.73) and COPD-related hospitalization (aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.81-2.27) in TB survivors. Among those who developed COPD, the hospitalization rate was higher in individuals with post-TB COPD compared to those with non-TB COPD (10.7/1,000 vs. 4.9/1,000 person-years, P < 0.001), showing an increased risk of COPD-related hospitalization (aHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.17-2.92). CONCLUSION: TB survivors had higher risks of incident COPD and COPD-related hospitalization compared to controls. These results suggest that previous TB is an important COPD etiology associated with COPD-related hospitalization.

Impacts of regular physical activity on hospitalisation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Studies that comprehensively evaluate the association between physical activity (PA) levels, particularly by quantifying PA intensity, and healthcare use requiring emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalisation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited in Korea. METHODS: The risk of all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation according to the presence or absence of COPD and the level of PA was evaluated in a retrospective nationwide cohort comprising 3308 subjects with COPD (COPD cohort) and 293 358 subjects without COPD (non-COPD cohort) from 2009 to 2017. RESULTS: The COPD group exhibited a higher relative risk of all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation across all levels of PA compared with the highly active control group (≥1500 metabolic equivalents (METs)-min/week). Specifically, the highest risk was observed in the sedentary group (adjusted HR (aHR) (95% CI) = 1.70 (1.59 to 1.81) for all-cause ED visit or hospitalisation, 5.45 (4.86 to 6.12) for respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation). A 500 MET-min/week increase in PA was associated with reductions in all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation in the COPD cohort (aHR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.88 to 0.96) for all-cause, 0.87 (0.82 to 0.93) for respiratory cause). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the presumed healthiest cohort, the control group with PA>1500 METs-min/week, the COPD group with reduced PA has a higher risk of ED visit or hospitalisation.

Proposed Etiotypes for COPD: Controversial issues.

The 2023 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) revised the definition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to broadly include a variety of etiologies. A new taxonomy, composed of etiotypes, aims to highlight the heterogeneity in causes and pathogenesis of COPD, allowing more personalized management strategies and emphasizing the need for targeted research to understand and manage COPD better. However, controversy arises with including some diseases under the umbrella term of COPD, as their clinical presentations and treatments differ from classical COPD, which is smoking-related. COPD due to infection (COPD-I) and COPD due to environmental exposure (COPD-P) are classifications within the new taxonomy. Some disease entities in these categories show distinct clinical features and may not benefit from conventional COPD treatments, raising questions about their classification as COPD subtypes. There is also controversy regarding whether bronchiectasis with airflow limitations should be classified as an etiotype of COPD. This article discusses controversial issues associated with the proposed etiotypes for COPD in terms of COPD-I, COPD-P, and bronchiectasis. While the updated COPD definition by GOLD 2023 is a major step towards recognizing the disease's complexity, it also raises questions about the classification of related respiratory conditions. This highlights the need for further research to improve our understanding and approach to COPD management.

JAK2 Loss Arising From Tumor-Spread-Through-Air-Spaces (STAS) Promotes Tumor Progression by Suppressing CD8+ T Cells in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Machine Learning Approach.

BACKGROUND: Tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) is a recently discovered risk factor for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The aim of this study was to investigate specific genetic alterations and anticancer immune responses related to STAS. By using a machine learning algorithm and drug screening in lung cancer cell lines, we analyzed the effect of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) on the survival of patients with LUAD and possible drug candidates. METHODS: This study included 566 patients with LUAD corresponding to clinicopathological and genetic data. For analyses of LUAD, we applied gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), in silico cytometry, pathway network analysis, in vitro drug screening, and gradient boosting machine (GBM) analysis. RESULTS: The patients with STAS had a shorter survival time than those without STAS (P < 0.001). We detected gene set-related downregulation of JAK2 associated with STAS using GSEA. Low JAK2 expression was related to poor prognosis and a low CD8+ T-cell fraction. In GBM, JAK2 showed improved survival prediction performance when it was added to other parameters (T stage, N stage, lymphovascular invasion, pleural invasion, tumor size). In drug screening, mirin, CCT007093, dihydroretenone, and ABT737 suppressed the growth of lung cancer cell lines with low JAK2 expression. CONCLUSION: In LUAD, low JAK2 expression linked to the presence of STAS might serve as an unfavorable prognostic factor. A relationship between JAK2 and CD8+ T cells suggests that STAS is indirectly related to the anticancer immune response. These results may contribute to the design of future experimental research and drug development programs for LUAD with STAS.

Predictors of Early and Late Lung Function Improvement in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Type2-Biologics in the PRISM Study.

BACKGROUND: The determinants linked to the short- and long-term improvement in lung function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) on biological treatment (BioT) remain elusive. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the predictors of early and late lung function improvement in patients with SEA after BioT. METHODS: 140 adult patients with SEA who received mepolizumab, dupilumab, or reslizumab were followed up for 6 months to evaluate improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between potential prognostic factors and improved lung function at 1 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: More than a third of patients with SEA using BioT showed early and sustained improvements in FEV1 after 1 month. A significant association was found between low baseline FEV1 and high blood eosinophil count and sustained FEV1 improvement after 1 month (0.54 [0.37-0.79] and 1.88 [1.28-2.97] odds ratios and 95% confidence interval, respectively). Meanwhile, among patients who did not experience FEV1 improvement after 1 month, 39% exhibited improvement at 6 months follow-up. A high ACT score measured at this visit was the most reliable predictor of late response after 6 months of treatment (OR and 95% CI 1.75 [1.09-2.98]). CONCLUSION: Factors predicting the efficacy of biological agents that improve lung function in SEA vary according to the stage of response.

Short-acting ß2-agonist prescriptions in patients with asthma: findings from the South Korean cohort of SABINA III.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) overuse being associated with poor asthma outcomes, data on SABA use in South Korea is scarce. Herein, we describe prescription patterns of SABA and other asthma medications in patients from the South Korean cohort of the SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) III study. METHODS: This study included patients with asthma aged ≥ 12 years, who had ≥ 3 consultations with the same healthcare provider, and medical records containing data for ≥ 12 months prior to the study visit. Patients were classified by investigator-defined asthma severity (per 2017 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendations) and practice type (primary or specialist care). Data on disease characteristics, asthma treatments, and clinical outcomes in the 12 months before the study visit were collected using electronic case report forms. RESULTS: Data from 476 patients (mean age, 55.4 years; female, 63.0%) were analyzed. Most patients were treated by specialists (83.7%) and had moderate-to-severe asthma (91.0%). Overall, 7.6% of patients were prescribed ≥ 3 SABA canisters (defined as over-prescription). In patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, 47.4% were over-prescribed SABA. Most patients (95.4%) were prescribed a fixed-dose combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting ß2-agonist as maintenance therapy. Although asthma was well-controlled/partly-controlled in 91.6% of patients, 29.6% experienced ≥ 1 severe asthma exacerbation. CONCLUSION: SABA over-prescription was reported in nearly 50% of patients prescribed SABA in addition to maintenance therapy, underscoring the need to align clinical practices with the latest evidence-based recommendations and educate physicians and patients on appropriate SABA use.

Increased Risk of New-Onset Asthma After COVID-19: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that respiratory virus infections may be associated with new-onset asthma. However, whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of new-onset asthma remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether recent COVID-19 increases the risk of new-onset asthma and whether COVID-19 vaccination could mitigate this risk. METHODS: We constructed 3 different study designs using the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database: study 1: COVID-19-diagnosed subjects (COVID-19 cohort) and their matched controls; study 2: COVID-19-vaccinated subjects (vaccination cohort) and their matched controls; and study 3: vaccination cohort and their matched controls, excluding subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. RESULTS: In study 1, 1.6% of the COVID-19 cohort and 0.7% of the matched cohort developed new-onset asthma, with incidences of 31.28 and 14.55 per 1,000 person-years, respectively (P < .001). The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of new-onset asthma (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14; 95% CI 1.88-2.45) than matched controls. In study 2, the vaccination cohort had a lower risk of new-onset asthma than the matched controls (aHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.76-0.89). However, among subjects without a COVID-19 diagnosis, COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with a reduced risk of new-onset asthma in study 3 (aHR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.04). In subgroup analysis, the risk of new-onset asthma was significantly lower in fully vaccinated subjects and higher in older subjects and in those with diabetes mellitus than in their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 was associated with a higher incidence of new-onset asthma, which might be preventable by COVID-19 vaccination.

Development of the Rapid Cough Questionnaire: Key item identification.

BACKGROUND: The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a reliable tool for measuring the multidimensional impact of cough on patients' quality of life; however, its scoring algorithm is lengthy and complex for routine clinical use. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to develop a simplified version of the LCQ, the Rapid Cough Questionnaire (RCQ), as a substitue in clinical practice and validate the RCQ using an independent cohort. METHODS: To select items for the RCQ score, a correlation network was used to determine the items from each domain that were strongly correlated with the total LCQ score. The final items for the RCQ were selected on the basis of the centrality of the node degree, betweenness, and closeness in the correlation network. RESULTS: The RCQ score was derived from 3 items: tiredness (LCQ3) in the physical domain, the feeling of being fed up (LCQ13) in the psychological domain, and annoyance with partner/family/friends (LCQ19) in the social domain. The correlation between the LCQ and RCQ was high, with a coefficient of 0.93 (P < .001). The mean score of the RCQ was 11.2 ± 3.2, with scores ranging from 5.15 to 19.55. The minimal clinically important difference in the RCQ score was calculated to be 1.6 using a distribution-based method. The concurrent validity of the LCQ and the RCQ with cough numeric rating scale was similar. In the validation cohort, the correlation between the LCQ and RCQ scores was consistent regardless of sex and etiology. CONCLUSION: The RCQ score, which is concise, reliable, and valid, can be a valuable tool for patient assessment, particularly in clinical practice.

A comparison of treatment response to biologics in asthma-COPD overlap and pure asthma: Findings from the PRISM study.

Background: Despite the increasing use of biologics in severe asthma, there is limited research on their use in asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO). We compared real-world treatment responses to biologics in ACO and asthma. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study using data from the Precision Medicine Intervention in Severe Asthma (PRISM). ACO was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7 and a smoking history of >10 pack-years. Physicians selected biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab) based on each United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval criteria. Results: After six-month treatment with biologics, both patients with ACO (N = 13) and asthma (N = 81) showed positive responses in FEV1 (10.69 ± 17.17 vs. 11.25 ± 12.87 %, P = 0.652), Asthma Control Test score (3.33 ± 5.47 vs. 5.39 ± 5.42, P = 0.290), oral corticosteroid use (-117.50 ± 94.38 vs. -115.06 ± 456.85 mg, P = 0.688), fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels (-18.62 ± 24.68 vs. -14.66 ± 45.35 ppb, P = 0.415), sputum eosinophils (-3.40 ± 10.60 vs. -14.48 ± 24.01 %, P = 0.065), blood eosinophils (-36.47 ± 517.02 vs. -363.22 ± 1294.59, P = 0.013), and exacerbation frequency (-3.07 ± 4.42 vs. -3.19 ± 5.11, P = 0.943). The odds ratio for exacerbation and time-to-first exacerbation showed no significant difference after full adjustments, and subgroup analysis according to biologic type was also showed similar results. Conclusions: Biologics treatment response patterns in patients with ACO and asthma were comparable, suggesting that biologics should be actively considered for ACO patients as well.

Associations between depression and anxiety index and frequency of acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) influence clinical characteristics and prognosis. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the clinical characteristics and exacerbation rate of COPD according to the presence of depression or anxiety. DESIGN: This study used data from The Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) cohort, a nationwide prospective cohort from 54 medical centers, between April 2012 and 2019. METHODS: Depression and anxiety were diagnosed with the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Negative binomial regression analysis was performed to analyze the frequency of exacerbations in depressed patients and anxiety. Differences in lung function trajectory according to presence of depression/anxiety were analyzed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: In all, 2147 patients were enrolled. Depressed patients or anxiety had lower lung function, higher modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, and COPD assessment test score, and higher rates of exacerbation in the past year than those without depression/anxiety. Depressed patients had a higher frequency of moderate to severe exacerbations [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR): 1.57, CI: 1.17-2.11, p = 0.002] and those with anxiety had higher frequencies of moderate to severe (IRR: 1.52, CI: 1.03-2.27, p = 0.038) and severe exacerbations (IRR: 2.13, CI: 1.09-4.15, p = 0.025) during 1-year follow-up compared to those without these comorbidities. The differences in the change in annual forced expiratory volume in 1 seconds (FEV1) over 3 years according to the presence of depression or anxiety were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Depressed and anxious patients showed increased respiratory symptoms and exacerbation rate as well as reduced health-related quality of life, whereas there were no significant differences in changes in lung function between groups with and without depression/anxiety.

Association between non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and the risk of incident dementia: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, are associated with an increased risk of dementia. However, few data are available regarding the risk of dementia in individuals with bronchiectasis. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between bronchiectasis and the risk of incident dementia using a longitudinal population-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 4,068,560 adults older than 50 years without previous dementia were enrolled from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database in 2009. They were followed up until the date of the diagnosis of dementia or December 31, 2020. The study exposure was the diagnosis of bronchiectasis, and the primary outcome was incident dementia comprising Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. RESULTS: During the median follow-up duration of 9.3 years, the incidence of all-cause dementia was 1.6-fold higher in individuals with bronchiectasis than in those without bronchiectasis (15.0 vs. 9.3/1000 person-years, p < .001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the risk of all dementia was significantly higher in individuals with bronchiectasis than in those without bronchiectasis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.14). In a subgroup analysis by dementia type, individuals with bronchiectasis had an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease compared to those without bronchiectasis (aHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.12); the risk of vascular dementia did not significantly differ between the two groups (aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.21). CONCLUSION: Bronchiectasis was associated with an increased risk of dementia, especially Alzheimer's disease.

Prospective direct comparison of biologic treatments for severe eosinophilic asthma: Findings from the PRISM study.

BACKGROUND: Although various monoclonal antibodies have been used as add-on therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA), to the best of our knowledge, no direct head-to-head comparative study has evaluated their efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in patients with SEA. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective observational study in patients with SEA who had received 1 of these biologic agents for at least 6 months. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of the first exacerbation event, adjusting for sputum or blood eosinophils and common asthma-related covariates. The annual exacerbation rate was analyzed using a negative binomial model, and a mixed-effect model was used to analyze changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and asthma control test score over time. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients with SEA were included in the analysis; 71 (50%) received dupilumab; 40 (28%) received reslizumab, and 30 (21%) received mepolizumab. During the 12-month follow-up, 27.5%, 43.3%, and 38.0% of patients in the reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab groups, respectively, experienced at least 1 exacerbation. However, after adjusting for confounding factors, the dupilumab and mepolizumab groups showed similar outcomes in time-to-first exacerbation, exacerbation rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and asthma control test score to those of the reslizumab group. CONCLUSION: In patients with SEA, treatment with reslizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab resulted in comparable clinical outcomes within a 12-month period. The cohort protocol was sanctioned by the Institutional Review Board of each study center (clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT05164939).

Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a higher risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) than individuals without COPD; however, longitudinal evidence is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the risk of IHD between COPD and control cohorts using a longitudinal nationwide database. METHODS: We used 2009-2017 data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC). Adult participants at least 20 years of age who underwent health examinations and without a history of COPD or IHD were included (n = 540,976). Participants were followed from January 1, 2009, until death, development of IHD, or December 31, 2019, whichever came first. RESULTS: At baseline, there were 3,421 participants with incident COPD and 537,555 participants without COPD. During a median of 8.0 years (5.3-9.1 years) of follow-up, 2.51% of the participants with COPD (n = 86) and 0.77% of the participants without COPD (n = 4,128) developed IHD, with an incidence of 52.24 and 10.91 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. Participants with COPD had a higher risk of IHD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.93) than subjects without COPD. Demographics such as age, sex, body mass index, and personal health behaviors including smoking status and physical activity did not show significant interaction with the relationship between COPD and IHD (P for interaction > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that COPD is associated with the development of IHD independent of demographic characteristics and health-related behaviors. Based on these results, clinicians should closely monitor the onset of IHD in subjects with COPD.

Impact of air pollution on healthcare utilization in patients with bronchiectasis.

Introduction: Air pollutants are increasingly recognized to affect long-term outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis. We aimed to figure out the association between air pollutants and the risk of healthcare utilization in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: Data for 1,029 subjects with bronchiectasis in Seoul were extracted. The air pollutants included particulate matter of 10 µm or less in diameter (PM10), particulate matter of 2.5 µm or less in diameter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The outcome was all-cause healthcare uses, defined as outpatient visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. The concentration-response curves between each air pollutant and relative risks for healthcare utilization were obtained. Results: There were significant correlations between air pollutant concentrations and the risk of healthcare utilization, particularly for PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO. This risk was observed even at concentrations below the recommended safe thresholds for the general population. The slopes for the association between PM10 and NO2 and the risk of healthcare use showed a logarithmic growth pattern, with the steepest increase up to 30 µg/m3 and 0.030 parts per million (ppm), respectively. The curves for SO2 and CO showed an inverted U-shaped pattern, with a peak at 0.0045 ppm and a slow upward curve, respectively. No specific trends were observed for PM2.5 and O3 and the risk of healthcare use. Discussion: Increased concentrations of PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO were associated with increased healthcare utilization in patients with bronchiectasis. For patients with bronchiectasis, there were no safety thresholds for those air pollutants, and even low levels of air pollutant exposure can negatively impact bronchiectasis outcomes.

When is LABA/LAMA Better than LAMA in GOLD Group B or D Patients for Reducing Acute Exacerbations of COPD?

Long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic-antagonist (LAMA) dual therapy has been found to be more effective than LAMA monotherapy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, among patients with group B or D COPD, the characteristics of patients for whom LABA/LAMA dual therapy is superior to LAMA monotherapy in minimizing acute exacerbations remain unknown. With data from a prospective COPD cohort, subgroup analyses were conducted to determine whether LABA/LAMA dual therapy was superior to LAMA monotherapy in reducing the rate of acute exacerbations in group B and D COPD patients. Group B and D COPD patients taking LAMA or LABA/LAMA were enrolled according to the 2022 Global initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease guidelines. A total of 737 patients were included in this study: 600 with group B COPD and 137 with group D COPD. Compared with patients taking LAMA monotherapy, those taking LABA/LAMA had a significantly lower incidence of acute exacerbations over 1 year. In the subgroup of patients ≥70 years old, there was a significantly lower risk of severe COPD exacerbations among group B patients taking LABA/LAMA than among those taking LAMA monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.258; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.095-0.703). In contrast, in the subgroup of group D patients with COPD Assessment Test scores ≥25, compared with LAMA monotherapy, LABA/LAMA treatment was associated with lower risk of severe COPD exacerbations (OR, 0.115; 95% CI, 0.018-0.749). The combination of LABA and LAMA was found to be superior to LAMA monotherapy, especially for treating older adults with group B COPD, as well as for group D patients with severe symptoms.

Baseline Cohort Profile of the Korean Chronic Cough Registry: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

PURPOSE: The Korean Chronic Cough Registry study was initiated to characterize patients with chronic cough (CC) and investigate their outcomes in real-world clinical practice. This report aims to describe the baseline cohort profile and study protocols. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective observational cohort study included newly referred CC patients and those already being treated for refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RUCC). Cough status was assessed using a visual analog scale, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and the Cough Hypersensitivity Questionnaire (CHQ). RESULTS: A total of 610 patients (66.9% women; median age 59.0 years) were recruited from 18 centers, with 176 being RUCC patients (28.9%). The median age at CC onset was 50.1 years, and 94.4% had adult-onset CC (≥ 19 years). The median cough duration was 4 years. Compared to newly referred CC patients, RUCC patients had a longer cough duration (6.0 years vs. 3.0 years) but had fewer symptoms and signs suggesting asthma, rhinosinusitis, or gastroesophageal acid reflux disease. Subjects with RUCC had lower LCQ scores (10.3 ± 3.3 vs. 11.6 ± 3.6; P < 0.001) and higher CHQ scores (9.1 ± 3.9 vs. 8.4 ± 4.1; P = 0.024). There were no marked differences in the characteristics of cough between refractory chronic cough and unexplained chronic cough. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cough typically develops in adulthood, lasting for years. Cough severity and quality of life impairment indicate the presence of unmet clinical needs and insufficient cough control in real-world clinical practice. Longitudinal follow-up is warranted to investigate the natural history and treatment outcomes.